Independent architecture review.
A time-boxed, written review of how the system is structured — before the next two years of work lock you in.
How the review works
We sit with the people who run the product and the people who write the code, then write down how the system should be structured — and what to stop doing.
You leave with a target architecture, a sequence, and the constraints that apply: connectivity, payments, customer data separation, compliance, and the team you have. The same approach sat under Tikketi and under KifaruOS.
- Current-state reviews of code, data, and operations
- Target architecture and integration maps
- Build-versus-buy, including when not to custom-build
- Delivery shape: team, sequencing, and what “done” means
- Cutover and migration risk, named before anyone estimates sprints
If you already know you need a build, see custom software development. If you need the decision first, start here. How a project runs is on how we work.
Contact us for a time-boxed review.
What the review covers
Current state
Code, data, and operations as they run — including spreadsheets and undocumented integrations.
Target architecture
Service boundaries, data ownership, and an integration map. Constraints named: connectivity, payments, customer data separation, compliance, team.
Build versus buy
When to use KifaruOS, Juniper, or Swara. When to buy. When custom is cheaper than configuring a generic ERP for five years.
A sequence
What to stop doing, what to do first, and what “done” means. Delivery shape your team can staff.
Risk, written down
Cutover, data migration, and the failure modes that matter in production.
Review and build are separate
The review is a billed engagement. A build is a separate decision.
Related
Talk through your setup
A time-boxed review with written recommendations and a sequence your team can ship.
Book a conversation